Deletion of humanum est. Copy autem diabolicum.

Deletion of humanum est. Copy autem diabolicum.

Abstract by Federico Manfredi

Ruling by Judge Silvia Giani , dated July 25, confirmed the earlier precedent-setting  decision, modifying the part prohibiting the marketing of the packaging of the disc “Is this life we really want?”, inflicting a penalty of €100 for every infringement. The case, which made the headlines the world over, regards the extreme resemblance of Roger Waters’ new album to some works by the famed artist Emilio Isgrò. The artist, counseled by our firm, claimed copyright infringement of some of his works including “Cancellations” 1964. Sony Music Entertainment Italy argued that the erasing technique used was not copyright-protected as an idea.

The Judge, adhering to the arguments presented by Salvatore Trifirò and Francesco Autelitano, found for plagiarism in the expressive form of the artist’s idea and not in the artistic idea itself. Indeed one cannot be denied the right to use the cancellation effect, but this may not justify the plagiarism of the works of Isgrò through mere production of some cancellations. Such were the cogent arguments that led the Milan Tribunal to make a decision with worldwide ramifications, setting a precedent in the history of national and non-copyright law.

0

Related Posts

Robot at new work…

Robot at new work place By Stefano Trifirò John Nasbitt the scholar of international fame invented the term of globalisation 30 years ago. His book “Mind Set” suggests the mental…
Read more

The Constitutional Court ruled…

The Constitutional Court ruled on the constitutionality of the Job Act related to the scaled protection raised by the employment Tribunal of Rome By Stefano Trifirò Last September 2018 the…
Read more

Recording of conversations and…

Recording of conversations and the use of CCTV at the workplace: rights and duties The Supreme Court gave guidelines about vocal recordings and CCTV at the workplace without the permission…
Read more